Banned from Slug.com

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Banned from Slug.com

fschmidt
Administrator
I was just banned from Slug.com .  Slug.com is dominated by white nationalists, so I shouldn't be surprised.  But this makes it clear to me that white nationalists are the enemy of all who value freedom.  I have been banned from every forum dominated by white nationalists.  White nationalists are basically proles of modern culture whose main concern is their race.  I now recognize that white nationalists are my enemy just as much as any Leftist is.

North Idaho is part of the American Redoubt concept which is anti-racist.  White nationalists should not be welcome there any more than Leftists.  And that was the sense that I got when visiting there, that the issue there is freedom, not race.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Banned from Slug.com

Allen
Your post seems like an emotional overreaction against white nationalists. Slug.com moderation is probably not dominated by white nationalists. I, as arguably a white nationalist depending on the definition, have also been banned by every forum dominated by supposed white nationalists. White nationalists probably are your enemy in the main due to your ethnicity, but that may be just common sense on their part with them being wrong in your individual case but right in the majority of cases. Only certain races are suited to freedom. Yes you get outliers from other races, but America was largely an Anglo-Protestant concept. To think it will work with letting in individuals who seem to be with the program is silly. Yes, as you've said, the extreme racialist perspective is also silly, but if you check with animal breeders and such, I think the successful strategy would be skewed towards it.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Banned from Slug.com

Allen
In reply to this post by fschmidt
Oh and by the way the American Redoubt concept is screwed from the beginning because they don't have a coastline. It is like Rhodesia. They could have whatever kill ratio they wanted, but once they were surrounded the war was over.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Banned from Slug.com

fschmidt
Administrator
Switzerland has done okay.  The American Redoubt could be to America what Switzerland is to Europe.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Banned from Slug.com

fschmidt
Administrator
In reply to this post by Allen
Of course there are exceptions in every group.  I have nothing against individual white nationalists, but I don't like them as a group.  As a group, the American Redoubt types seem pretty good but they aren't online much.  I will have to move there to judge them better.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Banned from Slug.com

The Opposition
In reply to this post by Allen
Allen wrote
White nationalists probably are your enemy in the main due to your ethnicity, but that may be just common sense on their part with them being wrong in your individual case but right in the majority of cases.
From their point of view he is likely to be an enemy and they don't have a way to confirm that he's not.

Ironically he's now doing to them what they do to him: Judging them to be enemies based on grouping rather than the individual.

I'm not saying people can afford not to do that. I don't think they can afford it. It's a necessary strategy everyone must engage in, in a world with tribal warfare. And no, he can't help his race but the white nationalists can help being white nationalists. That's true. However, since the judgment occurs in the mind of the observer, who is forced at some level to pick based on probability, because either way 90% of snakes will bite you and 90% of kittens will not, it has nothing to do with whether anyone had the choice to be a snake or a kitten. You pick the kitten.